Secure.gov sites utilize HTTPS
A lock (Lock Locked padlock) or https:// indicates you've securely connected to the.gov website. Share delicate details just on authorities, safe and secure websites.
- About - The Chief law officer
- Organizational Chart
- Budget & Performance
- History
- Privacy Program
- Press Releases
- Speeches
- Videos
- Photo Galleries
- Blogs
- Podcasts
- Guidance Documents
- Forms
- Publications
- Information for Victims in Large Cases
- Justice Manual
- Business and Contracts
- Why Justice?
- Benefits
- DOJ Vacancies
- Legal Careers at DOJ
Utilities
- About About
Our Work
- Contact the Division Contact the Division
Report an Offense
- Cases and Matters
- Press Room Press Room
Videos
Publications
- Employment Opportunities Employment Opportunities
Experienced Professionals
Attorney general of the United States ´ s Honors Program
Volunteer and Paid Student Internship Programs
- Civil Liberty FOIA Civil Rights FOIA
Emmett Till Act/Cold Case Memoranda
- En español
- About - title=" About" About
- The Attorney general of the United States
- Organizational Chart
- Budget & Performance
- History
- Privacy Program
- title=" News" News
- Press Releases
- Speeches
- Videos
- Photo Galleries
- Blogs
- Podcasts
- title=" Guidance & Resources" Resources
- Guidance Documents
- Forms
- Publications
- Information for Victims in Large Cases
- Justice Manual
- Business and Contracts
- Employment
- Why Justice?
- Benefits
- DOJ Vacancies
- Legal Careers at DOJ
- Our Offices
- Find Help
- Contact Us
Breadcrumb
1. Justice.gov
2. Civil Liberty Division
3. The Fair Housing Act
The Fair Housing Act
- Facebook
- X.
- LinkedIn.
- Email
The Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq., prohibits discrimination by direct service providers of housing, such as proprietors and realty companies as well as other entities, such as municipalities, banks or other loan provider and property owners insurance provider whose inequitable practices make housing unavailable to individuals since of:
race or color.
religious beliefs.
sex.
national origin.
familial status, or.
special needs.
In cases involving discrimination in mortgage loans or home improvement loans, the Department may file match under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. The Department brings cases where there is proof of a pattern or practice of discrimination or where a denial of rights to a group of persons raises an issue of basic public importance. Where force or threat of force is utilized to deny or disrupt reasonable housing rights, the Department of Justice might set up criminal procedures. The Fair Housing Act likewise offers procedures for dealing with specific grievances of discrimination. Individuals who believe that they have actually been victims of an illegal housing practice, may submit a grievance with the Department of Housing and Urban Development [HUD] or file their own claim in federal or state court. The Department of Justice brings matches on behalf of people based upon referrals from HUD.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Race or Color
One of the main goals of the Fair Housing Act, when Congress enacted it in 1968, was to prohibit race discrimination in sales and leasings of housing. Nevertheless, more than 30 years later on, race discrimination in housing continues to be an issue. Most of the Justice Department's pattern or practice cases involve claims of race discrimination. Sometimes, housing suppliers attempt to disguise their discrimination by providing incorrect details about availability of housing, either stating that nothing was readily available or guiding homeseekers to particular areas based on race. Individuals who get such false details or misdirection might have no knowledge that they have been victims of discrimination. The Department of Justice has actually brought numerous cases declaring this sort of discrimination based upon race or color. In addition, the Department's Fair Housing Testing Program looks for to uncover this kind of covert discrimination and hold those responsible accountable. The majority of the mortgage lending cases brought by the Department under the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act have actually alleged discrimination based on race or color. A few of the Department's cases have likewise alleged that towns and other city government entities broke the Fair Housing Act when they rejected authorizations or zoning changes for housing advancements, or relegated them to mainly minority communities, due to the fact that the potential homeowners were anticipated to be primarily African-Americans.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Religion
The Fair Housing Act forbids discrimination in housing based upon religion. This prohibition covers circumstances of obvious discrimination against members of a specific religion too less direct actions, such as zoning ordinances designed to restrict the use of private homes as a places of praise. The variety of cases filed given that 1968 declaring religious discrimination is small in contrast to some of the other restricted bases, such as race or nationwide origin. The Act does contain a minimal exception that allows non-commercial housing operated by a religious organization to reserve such housing to individuals of the same religious beliefs.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Sex, Including Unwanted Sexual Advances
The Fair Housing Act makes it illegal to discriminate in housing on the basis of sex. In recent years, the Department's focus in this area has been to challenge unwanted sexual advances in housing. Women, particularly those who are poor, and with limited housing options, often have little recourse but to endure the embarrassment and destruction of sexual harassment or risk having their households and themselves got rid of from their homes. The Department's enforcement program is targeted at proprietors who produce an untenable living environment by requiring sexual favors from renters or by creating a sexually hostile environment for them. In this way we seek both to obtain relief for renters who have been treated unjustly by a property owner since of sex and also deter other prospective abusers by making it clear that they can not continue their conduct without facing consequences. In addition, prices discrimination in mortgage lending might also negatively impact women, especially minority women. This kind of discrimination is unlawful under both the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon National Origin
The Fair Housing Act forbids discrimination based upon national origin. Such discrimination can be based either upon the nation of an individual's birth or where his/her forefathers come from. Census data indicate that the Hispanic population is the fastest growing segment of our nation's population. The Justice Department has taken enforcement action against municipal federal governments that have tried to minimize or limit the variety of Hispanic families that may live in their neighborhoods. We have taken legal action against lending institutions under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act when they have actually imposed more stringent underwriting standards on mortgage or made loans on less beneficial terms for Hispanic customers. The Department has actually likewise taken legal action against lending institutions for discrimination against Native Americans. Other locations of the country have actually experienced an increasing variety of national origin groups within their populations. This consists of brand-new immigrants from Southeastern Asia, such as the Hmong, the former Soviet Union, and other portions of Eastern Europe. We have taken action against private landlords who have actually victimized such people.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Familial Status
The Fair Housing Act, with some exceptions, restricts discrimination in housing versus families with kids under 18. In addition to forbiding a straight-out rejection of housing to households with children, the Act also avoids housing suppliers from imposing any unique requirements or conditions on tenants with custody of kids. For example, property owners might not locate households with children in any single part of a complex, put an unreasonable restriction on the total variety of individuals who might reside in a dwelling, or limit their access to recreational services offered to other renters. In the majority of instances, the modified Fair Housing Act forbids a housing provider from refusing to lease or sell to families with kids. However, some facilities might be designated as Housing for Older Persons (55 years of age). This kind of housing, which meets the requirements set forth in the Housing for Older Persons Act of 1995, might run as "senior" housing. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has released regulations and extra assistance detailing these statutory requirements.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability
The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in all types of housing transactions. The Act defines individuals with a disability to suggest those people with psychological or physical problems that considerably limit one or more significant life activities. The term mental or physical impairment may include conditions such as loss of sight, hearing problems, mobility impairment, HIV infection, mental retardation, alcohol addiction, drug dependency, persistent tiredness, learning special needs, head injury, and psychological illness. The term major life activity may include seeing, hearing, walking, breathing, performing manual jobs, taking care of one's self, finding out, speaking, or working. The Fair Housing Act likewise secures individuals who have a record of such a problems, or are considered as having such an impairment. Current users of prohibited controlled substances, individuals convicted for prohibited manufacture or circulation of an illegal drug, sex transgressors, and juvenile offenders are not thought about disabled under the Fair Housing Act, by virtue of that status. The Fair Housing Act affords no securities to individuals with or without specials needs who present a direct danger to the persons or residential or commercial property of others. Determining whether someone poses such a direct threat should be made on a customized basis, nevertheless, and can not be based upon general assumptions or speculation about the nature of an impairment. The Division's enforcement of the Fair Housing Act's defenses for individuals with specials needs has actually focused on 2 major areas. One is insuring that zoning and other regulations worrying land usage are not used to hinder the domestic choices of these people, consisting of needlessly restricting common, or gather together, residential plans, such as group homes. The second location is guaranteeing that newly constructed multifamily housing is built in accordance with the Fair Housing Act's ease of access requirements so that it is accessible to and usable by people with specials needs, and, in particular, those who use wheelchairs. There are other federal statutes that restrict discrimination against people with impairments, consisting of the Americans with Disabilities Act, which is enforced by the Disability Rights Section of the Civil Rights Division.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability Group Homes
Some people with specials needs might live together in congregate living plans, often referred to as "group homes." The Fair Housing Act prohibits towns and other local government entities from making zoning or land use decisions or executing land usage policies that exclude or otherwise discriminate versus individuals with impairments. The Fair Housing Act makes it illegal--
- To make use of land usage policies or actions that treat groups of persons with impairments less positively than groups of non-disabled persons. An example would be an ordinance prohibiting housing for persons with disabilities or a specific type of special needs, such as mental disorder, from locating in a specific area, while permitting other groups of unrelated people to live together in that location.
- To take action against, or deny an authorization, for a home due to the fact that of the special needs of individuals who live or would live there. An example would be rejecting a structure permit for a home since it was planned to supply housing for persons with psychological retardation.
- To decline to make reasonable accommodations in land usage and zoning policies and treatments where such accommodations may be necessary to pay for individuals or groups of persons with specials needs a level playing field to use and take pleasure in housing. What makes up a sensible accommodation is a case-by-case decision. Not all requested adjustments of rules or policies are affordable. If a requested modification enforces an excessive financial or administrative concern on a regional government, or if a modification creates a fundamental modification in a regional government's land use and zoning plan, it is not a "affordable" accommodation.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability-- Accessibility Features for New Construction
The Fair Housing Act specifies discrimination in housing versus persons with disabilities to consist of a failure "to create and construct" certain new multi-family dwellings so that they are accessible to and usable by persons with impairments, and particularly people who utilize wheelchairs. The Act requires all recently built multi-family homes of four or more systems meant for very first tenancy after March 13, 1991, to have particular features: an accessible entryway on an available path, accessible common and public use areas, doors sufficiently wide to accommodate wheelchairs, accessible routes into and through each house, light switches, electrical outlets, and thermostats in accessible location, supports in bathroom walls to accommodate grab bar setups, and functional cooking areas and restrooms configured so that a wheelchair can maneuver about the area.
Developers, builders, owners, and architects responsible for the style or building and construction of brand-new multi-family housing might be held responsible under the Fair Housing Act if their buildings fail to fulfill these design requirements. The Department of Justice has brought many enforcement actions against those who failed to do so. The majority of the cases have actually been solved by consent decrees providing a variety of types of relief, consisting of: retrofitting to bring inaccessible functions into compliance where possible and where it is not-- options (financial funds or other building and construction requirements) that will attend to making other housing systems available; training on the ease of access requirements for those associated with the construction process; a mandate that all new housing jobs abide by the availability requirements, and monetary relief for those injured by the offenses. In addition, the Department has actually looked for to promote availability through structure codes.
