For Christmas I got an interesting gift from a buddy - my really own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (great title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has radiant reviews.

Yet it was totally composed by AI, with a few easy prompts about me provided by my good friend Janet.

It's an interesting read, and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty style of composing, wiki.insidertoday.org but it's also a bit repetitive, and very verbose. It might have gone beyond Janet's prompts in collating information about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mysterious, repetitive hallucination in the form of my feline (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the primary executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually offered around 150,000 customised books, mainly in the US, trademarketclassifieds.com given that rotating from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to generate them, based upon an open source big language design.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who produced it, can buy any additional copies.

There is currently no barrier to anyone developing one in anyone's name, including celebrities - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around violent material. Each book includes a printed disclaimer specifying that it is imaginary, developed by AI, and created "entirely to bring humour and joy".

Legally, the copyright comes from the company, but Mr Mashiach worries that the item is planned as a "personalised gag gift", and the books do not get sold further.

He intends to expand his variety, producing various genres such as sci-fi, and perhaps providing an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted form of customer AI - offering AI-generated goods to human customers.

It's likewise a bit scary if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least because it most likely took less than a minute to produce, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable material based upon it.

"We need to be clear, when we are speaking about data here, we really suggest human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to regard creators' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is photos. It's artworks. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to learn how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a song including AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were fake, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not think the use of generative AI for creative functions need to be banned, but I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people's work without approval need to be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be very powerful but let's build it fairly and fairly."

OpenAI states Chinese competitors using its work for mariskamast.net their AI apps

DeepSeek: passfun.awardspace.us The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have chosen to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online content for training purposes. Others have actually chosen to work together - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for instance.

The UK government is considering an overhaul of the law that would permit AI developers to use developers' content on the internet to assist develop their designs, unless the rights holders opt out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "madness".

He explains that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and messing up the incomes of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is also highly against eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and a great deal of pleasure," states the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is weakening among its best performing industries on the unclear promise of development."

A government spokesperson stated: "No relocation will be made up until we are absolutely confident we have a useful plan that delivers each of our objectives: increased control for right holders to help them accredit their material, access to top quality material to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for right holders from AI developers."

Under the UK government's brand-new AI strategy, a nationwide data library containing public data from a wide range of sources will likewise be made available to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal rules to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to enhance the security of AI with, amongst other things, firms in the sector required to share information of the workings of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has now been reversed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is said to want the AI sector to face less guideline.

This comes as a number of lawsuits versus AI firms, and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been secured by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They claim that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their authorization, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "reasonable use" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of aspects which can constitute fair usage - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector engel-und-waisen.de is under increasing scrutiny over how it collects training information and whether it should be spending for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to ponder, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It became the many downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it established its technology for a fraction of the rate of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and oke.zone threatens American's present supremacy of the sector.

As for me and a profession as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I actually desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for morphomics.science Dummies highlights the existing weak point in generative AI tools for bigger jobs. It has lots of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be quite challenging to check out in parts due to the fact that it's so verbose.

But provided how rapidly the tech is developing, I'm unsure the length of time I can remain confident that my substantially slower human writing and editing skills, are better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest developments in international innovation, with analysis from BBC reporters around the globe.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.